Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://zone.biblio.laurentian.ca/handle/10219/3318
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Richard S.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-29T19:49:15Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-29T19:49:15Z-
dc.date.issued2018-08-28-
dc.identifier.citationSmith, R. S., 2018, An airborne electromagnetic system with a three-component transmitter and three-component receiver capable of detecting extremely conductive bodies: Geophysics, 83(5), E347-E356, doi: 10.1190/GEO2017-0849.1en_US
dc.identifier.issn0016-8033-
dc.identifier.issn1942-2156-
dc.identifier.urihttps://zone.biblio.laurentian.ca/handle/10219/3318-
dc.descriptionThis paper is © 2019 Society of Exploration Geophysicists. The posting is available free of charge and its use is subject to the SEG terms and conditions: https://seg.org/Terms-of-Useen_US
dc.description.abstractExtremely conductive bodies, such as those containing valuable nickel sulfides, have a secondary response that is dominated by an in-phase component, so this secondary response is very difficult to distinguish from the primary field emanating from the transmitter (because by definition they are identical in temporal shape and phase). Hence, an airborne electromagnetic (AEM) system able to identify the response from the extremely conductive bodies in the ground must be able to predict the primary field to identify and measure the secondary response of the extremely conductive body. This is normally done by having a rigid system and bucking out the predicted primary (which will not change significantly due to the rigidity). Unfortunately, these rigid systems must be small and are not capable of detecting extremely conductive bodies buried deeper than approximately 100 m. Another approach is to measure the transmitter current and geometry and subtract the primary mathematically, but these measurements must be extremely accurate and this is difficult or expensive, so it has not been done successfully for an AEM system. I exploit the geometric relationship of the primary fields from a three-component (3C) dipole transmitter. If the transmitter is mathematically rotated so that one axis points to the receiver, then linear combinations of the fields measured by a 3C receiver can be combined in such a way that the primary fields from the transmitter sum to zero and cancel. Alternatively, the measured transmitter current and response could be used to estimate the transmitter-receiver geometry and then to predict and remove the primary field. Any residual must be the secondary coming from a conductive body in the ground. Hence, extremely conductive bodies containing valuable minerals can be found. An AEM system with a 3C transmitter and a 3C receiver should not be too difficult to build.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipWork on this development project was funded by an Industrial Research Chair funded by NSERC, Vale, Glencore, KGHM International, Wallbridge Mining, and the Centre for Excellence in Mining Innovation (CEMI).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSociety of Exploration Geophysicistsen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1190/geo2017-0849.1-
dc.subjectelectromagneticsen_US
dc.subjectminingen_US
dc.subjectairborne surveyen_US
dc.subjecttime domainen_US
dc.subjectfrequency domainen_US
dc.titleAn airborne electromagnetic system with a three-component transmitter and three-component receiver capable of detecting extremely conductive bodiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Smith, Richard S.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Smith 2018 3CTx Open Access Geophysics.pdf767 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in LU|ZONE|UL are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.