Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://zone.biblio.laurentian.ca/handle/10219/3214
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOlesen-Schinke, Erin-
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-23T15:19:46Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-23T15:19:46Z-
dc.date.issued2018-12-14-
dc.identifier.urihttps://zone.biblio.laurentian.ca/handle/10219/3214-
dc.description.abstractProbation officers (PO) are considered part of the broader criminal justice system and are tasked with supervising offenders within a community setting. POs are guided by identified deliverables of maintaining public safety, fostering offender rehabilitation, and ensuring court ordered sanctions are enforced (Pitts, 2007). The organizational climate of probation work requires these goals be achieved within the confines of increasing workload and administrative demands, in conjunction with decreasing budgetary supports, coupled with a changing offender population who are regarded as increasingly more high-risk and multineed (Gonzales, Schofield & Hart, 2005; Pitts, 2007). Probation work is considered a highrisk occupation (Gonzales et al., 2005; Parsonage & Bushey, 1987). POs are exposed to direct trauma (Gonzales et al., 2005; Linder & Bonn, 1996; Lindner & Koehler, 1992; Parsonage & Bushey, 1987; Rapp-Paglicci, 2004) and indirect trauma (Lewis, Lewis & Garby, 2013; Severson & Pettus-Davis, 2011) within their workplace. Exposure to such occupational hazards can result in negative psychological impacts for POs (Lewis et al., 2012; Parsonage & Bushey, 1987). Front-line occupations such as police and fire services, emergency response, military, and correctional work have been notably studied within the research in relation to the occupational health risks associated with their employment (McFarlane & Bryant, 2007; O’Donnell & Stephens, 2001), yet probation work remains under investigated. This lack of knowledge about the contextual realities of probation work is significant considering the potential psychological impacts of probation work as experienced by POs (Gayman & Bradley 2013; Lewis et al., 2013; O’Donnell & Stephens, 2001; Severson & Pettus-Davis, 2011). Through this research I focused on investigating mental health outcomes for POs who have been exposed to a workplace critical incident (CI). The purpose of my study was to shed light on the phenomena of CIs and to better understand the numerous complexities associated with this phenomenon. The intersection of PO exposure to psychosocial occupational hazards and CIs and POs adaptations was investigated utilizing a grounded theory methodology.en_CA
dc.language.isoenen_CA
dc.subjectoccupational health and safetyen_CA
dc.subjectfront-line workeren_CA
dc.subjectpsychosocial hazarden_CA
dc.subjectprobation officeren_CA
dc.subjectprobation worken_CA
dc.subjectoccupational critical incidenten_CA
dc.subjectgrounded theoryen_CA
dc.subjectcompassion fatigueen_CA
dc.subjectburnouten_CA
dc.subjectvicarious traumaen_CA
dc.subjectoccupational trauma exposureen_CA
dc.subjectcritical incident stress debriefen_CA
dc.subjectcritical incident stress managementen_CA
dc.titleCritical incidents on the front-line: occupational health considerations for probation officersen_CA
dc.typeThesisen_CA
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Human Studiesen_CA
dc.publisher.grantorLaurentian University of Sudburyen_CA
Appears in Collections:Doctoral Theses
Human Studies and Interdisiplinarity - Doctoral Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Thesis for PhD in Human Studies Erin Olesen Schinke.pdf2.38 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in LU|ZONE|UL are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.