Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://zone.biblio.laurentian.ca/handle/10219/2406
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDuncan, Grant G. O.-
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-28T12:54:44Z-
dc.date.available2015-05-28T12:54:44Z-
dc.date.issued2015-05-28-
dc.identifier.urihttps://zone.biblio.laurentian.ca/dspace/handle/10219/2406-
dc.description.abstractRanking and prioritization are important endeavors that take place in a multitude of industrial, commercial and professional domains. The Delphi method is a systematic procedure for aggregating experts’ opinions, particularly those that are predicated on qualitative or otherwise judgmental information. The method of pairwise comparisons provides an elegant means by which the qualities of criteria or alternatives can be compared, ranked, quantized and provides methods for the identification and resolution of inconsistencies. This thesis examines and proposes a means by which the two methods can be combined, in order to provide an easy to use system (which is then implemented as a reference implementation) for ranking and prioritization of a number of alternatives that is broadly applicable to any number of ranking and prioritization problems.en_CA
dc.language.isoenen_CA
dc.publisherLaurentian University of Sudburyen_CA
dc.subjectPairwise comparisonsen_CA
dc.subjectThe Delphi methoden_CA
dc.subjectrankingen_CA
dc.subjectprioritizationen_CA
dc.titleOn Supporting Group Decision Making by a Hybrid Method of the Method of Pairwise Comparisons and the Delphi Methoden_CA
dc.typeThesisen_CA
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc) in Computational Sciencesen_CA
dc.publisher.grantorLaurentian University of Sudburyen_CA
Appears in Collections:Master's theses
Master's Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Thesis_2.pdf1.05 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in LU|ZONE|UL are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.