Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFryer, Sara Anne-
dc.description.abstractBeginning with eight women’s experiences in accessing emergency contraception from a pharmacist, this research brings into view the undocumented “sexual health work” of obtaining the drug in northern Ontario. Between 2005 and 2008, emergency contraception was deregulated to behind-the-counter, forcing women to submit to mandatory counselling and screening about sex, menstruation and contraception at the pharmacy. Situating unwanted pregnancy as harmful in this context, an institutional ethnographic analysis explores the activities of health service delivery and identifies the different ideological practices that shaped women’s access like the steady creep of neoliberalism, professional specialization and clinical power. Ideological discourses construct an ideal contraceptive user, who is patient, compliant and appears “responsible”, contributing to the stigmatization of women. Findings suggest that an inaccurate government definition of emergency contraception contributes to ignorance and misperceptions about function; this, along with an empty federal policy vacuum for women’s health contributes to its problematic status in women’s contraceptive options.en_CA
dc.publisherLaurentian University of Sudburyen_CA
dc.subjectEmergency contraceptionen_CA
dc.subjectwomen’s accessen_CA
dc.subjectreproductive freedomen_CA
dc.subjectderegulation, feminismen_CA
dc.title“What does this do?” The neoliberal creep, sexual health work and the deregulation of emergency contraceptionen_CA
dc.description.degreeMaster of Arts (MA) in Sociologyen_CA
dc.publisher.grantorLaurentian University of Sudburyen_CA
Appears in Collections:Master's Theses
Master's Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fryer_Sara_Master_Thesis.pdf9.74 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail

Items in LU|ZONE|UL are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.